ALBATRON TI4600 DRIVER

Views Read Edit View history. Thermal paste offers greater heat transfer abilities then those yucky thermal pads. If interested take a look at this article of ours which covers some of these aspects. Merry Christmas from The Tech Report staff! Though its lineage was of the past-generation GeForce 2, the GeForce4 MX did incorporate bandwidth and fill rate-saving techniques, dual-monitor support, and a multi-sampling anti-aliasing unit from the Ti series; the improved bit DDR memory controller was crucial to solving the bandwidth limitations that plagued the GeForce and GeForce 2 lines. It outperformed the Mobility Radeon by a large margin, as well as being Nvidia’s first DirectX 8 laptop graphics solution.

Uploader: Maudal
Date Added: 18 September 2013
File Size: 9.89 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 38225
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

There was the Go, Go, and Go.

Neutronbeam Zak, you know you can’t validate any of the above details without first throwing Single page Print The card Alnatron Medusa GeForce4 Ti P’s curious numbering convention feels a little disingenuous, but there’s a method to Albatron’s madness, sort of.

Albatron GeForce4 Ti Review.

In latethere was an attempt to form a fourth family, also for the laptop market, the only member of it being the GeForce4 Go NV28M which was derived from the Ti line. From the rear, the tiny appearance of the Medusa GeForce4 Ti P’s memory heat sinks makes the card look absolutely massive.

To be on top of the market, Albatron ensures their products go under strict quality control and moreover they thrive on offering something extra than its competitors in the same price range. Bringing mobile gaming to new heights”. Well lets to4600 how true this claim is. A nice trend that we have noticed in the last little while is that manufacturers are using thermal paste between GPU’s and the heatsinks rather then thermal pads.

  AIW 9700 PRO DRIVER

Albatron GeForce4 Ti4600 Review

Albatorn that point the system would start to register artifacts with Artifact Tester. No Interruptions Day Shortbread. The GeForce4 Ti chipset has been around for some time now offering users an affordable alternative to the money draining GeForce4 Ti and GF4 Ti based solutions. Anything higher and Artifact Tester would start registering artifacts that were unnoticeable. On a side note, that nice metal cover with the Albatron logo had very sharp albatrin and I cut my finger on it! It seems however that Albatron was a little too eager when applying thermal paste on the test sample, it spilt over and landed on the PCB next to the core.

GeForce 4 series – Wikipedia

In fact, Gainward’s GeForce4 Ti is the only consumer-level graphics albatroon I’m aware of that features two digital outputs. One step forward, two steps back? The name of that game is just how high can the memory and GPU clock!

Retrieved January 2, Thermal tj4600 offers greater heat transfer abilities then those yucky thermal pads. GeForce Series Video cards Computer-related introductions in This kept the MX in production while the was discontinued.

  LEXMARK X7350 COMPATIBLE DRIVER

Albatron GeForce 4 Ti4200P Turbo

DirectX 9 goes mainstreamTech Report, November 27, The card The Medusa GeForce4 Ti P’s curious numbering convention feels a little disingenuous, but there’s a method to Albatron’s madness, sort of. Beginners Guides Cases and Access.

Privacy policy and Terms of Use. Privacy policy and Terms of Slbatron. Kepler GeForce Steam names the best-selling games of In fact, I think they’ve pretty much thrown the reference design out the window.

Despite harsh criticism by gaming enthusiasts, the GeForce4 MX was a market success.

Albatron GeForce4 Ti Review –

This family is a derivative of the GeForce4 MX family, produced for the laptop market. Retrieved from ” https: This memory bottleneck is in aobatron the main feature that differentiated these cards from each other.

In practice its main competitors were chipset-integrated graphics solutions, such as Intel’s G and Nvidia’s own nForce 2, but its main advantage over those was multiple-monitor support; Intel’s solutions did not have this at all, and the nForce 2’s multi-monitor support was much inferior to what the MX series offered.

Many criticized the GeForce 4 MX name as a misleading marketing ploy since it was less advanced than the preceding GeForce 3.